Mainstream Media Ignores Illegal Arrests


On Friday, March 23, Paul Gattone, a lawyer representing members of Occupy Tucson, held a press conference to protest the Tucson Police Department’s recent actions against the occupiers at Veinte de Agosto park downtown. Despite the fact that five occupiers had been arrested two nights before the press conference, and two the night before, no mainstream media turned up. One might think that seven arrests resulting from the police going after political activists would seem to warrant some news coverage, but the decision makers at the mainstream news outlets in Tucson decided not to cover either the arrest of the occupiers or the press conference denouncing the police actions.

Some of the extra-legal actions and abuse of authority by the Tucson Police Department that were highlighted in the press release include:

  1. The TPD has exercised selective enforcement, violated their own policies with regard to handling evidence, and refused to return personal property of protestors in deliberate indifference to the law. Many occupiers had their possessions confiscated without property receipts given to them as is mandated by city law. Moreover, for many of the protestors, the jackets, clothes, shoes and other necessities taken by the TPD and never returned constitute all of their worldly possessions. Regardless of what you think of Occupy Tucson, these police actions constitute illegal seizure of property.
  2. The police have repeatedly ignored the city park curfew of 10:30 p.m. to illegally arrest people whose crime appears to be holding signs. On the evening of Friday, March 23, 2012 at around 9:30 p.m., three individuals were arrested while walking within the four feet easement mandated by the police the night before. The victims were protesting with signs; no blankets or any other personal possessions were present. One individual was reportedly knocked to the ground and injured as the TPD arrested the three.
  3. Among the illegal and irresponsible police actions are constantly changing definitions of park and sidewalk boundaries and the subsequent entrapping and arresting of protestors.
  4. Camping gear is selectively illegal, according to the TPD. The TPD even stated that it was illegal for one of the Occupiers to have his truck parked alongside the park because it had camping gear in it. However, no ordinance was cited by TPD regarding laws against having camping gear in the back of one’s vehicle.

The unlawful actions towards and abuses of Occupy Tucson by the TPD warrants investigation and reporting. However, the mainstream media only seems to be interested in scratching the surface of the story and not taking a longer view of our movement. It’s true that the Arizona Daily Star and the local television news stations did provide some coverage of Occupy in the early days of our encampment, but that soon changed. First, reporters stopped visiting the encampments and instead began to rely on “official sources” for their information about Occupy Tucson, meaning especially the Tucson Police Department; then they simply stopped covering us.

This lack of media coverage presents a problem for Occupy Tucson because, in the modern world, it often seems that if you aren’t covered in the mass media, you don’t exist. Perhaps this is why members of Occupy Tucson, even though we undertake actions of creative disobedience that result in a whole string of arrests, are then asked by members of the public whether we still exist because “I never hear anything about Occupy Tucson anymore.”

On the positive side the experience of being frozen out of the mainstream media has reminded us at Occupy Tucson why it is that alternative media is so important. And why a publication like the Occupied Tucson Citizen is so necessary.

3 thoughts on “Mainstream Media Ignores Illegal Arrests”

  1. No one showed up to hear what paul had to say becasus most of them know that paul is a bad lawyer. This issue is what stops the media from taking him seriously. The media has vetted him, and found him less than up to the task of protecting the rights of the people

  2. This is, I believe, a pretty silly comment. First of all I believe Paul to be a good and not a bad lawyer. But even if he were a bad lawyer, if he were the lawyer representing the people engaged in this action, it would be incumbent for the press to show up. Further, the media doesn’t “vet” lawyers and not report on their cases because they feel them inadequate to the “task of protecting the rights of the people”! They vet them based on what kind of an audience they’ll get for them, what their advertisers will approve of, what their corporate owners will allow, etc.


Leave a Comment